Page 71 - Caietele_Confucius_11_2024
P. 71
object construction with the character "使" (shǐ). Li Language and Culture University's "BCC Corpus" as
Dazhong clarified the format of causative double- the basis for researching the acquisition of double-
object constructions as "main subject + 使 (shǐ) + object constructions by foreign students. While
secondary subject + secondary predicate" and analyzing error types, the study also emphasized
analyzed typical examples of errors made by foreign understanding the reasons behind these errors and
students in acquiring double-object constructions. He proposed corrective strategies. Cui Zhuqing's (2020)
explored the reasons behind errors such as high- "Analysis of Country-Specific Errors in the
frequency use of the character "使" (shǐ), misuse of Acquisition of Double-Object Constructions by
"使" (shǐ) instead of " " (jiào) or "让" (ràng), and Korean and Japanese Students Based on Corpora — A
reliance on the interpretation methods of Chinese Study on HSK Dynamic Writing Corpus" approached
dictionaries. the acquisition of double-object constructions by
Di Changyun (1996) studied common errors made by foreign students from a new perspective. The study
Japanese students when learning double-object compared and analyzed sentences with errors in the
constructions in the book "How to Speak Correctly? acquisition of double-object constructions by Korean
An Analysis of Common Grammatical Errors in and Japanese students from a country-specific
Japanese Students' Chinese Learning." He pointed out standpoint. It paid attention to differences in common
that "Japanese people are not accustomed to using error types between Korean and Japanese students and
double-object constructions, and even if they use proposed specific country-specific teaching strategies,
them occasionally, errors often occur in verb usage offering valuable insights for teaching.
and negation." Di Changyun provided a detailed Currently, there is a lack of systematic monographs on
analysis of common errors in verb usage and negation the acquisition of double-object constructions in the
in double-object constructions. field of Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language
With the establishment and improvement of domestic (TCFL). Existing research is mainly found in the form
interlanguage corpora, more researchers have of theses and articles published in journals, focusing
gradually focused on studying Chinese grammar primarily on describing errors rather than in-depth
issues and the acquisition of Chinese grammar items analysis. Studies based on large-scale authentic
by foreign students based on interlanguage corpora. corpora are particularly scarce. Therefore, it is
Zhou Wenhua conducted a comprehensive essential to collect real language data from classrooms
investigation of the acquisition of double-object and daily life on a large corpus basis, conduct a
constructions by intermediate-level Chinese learners comprehensive and systematic analysis of the usage of
in the article "Research on Foreign Students' double-object constructions by learners from specific
Acquisition of Double-Object Constructions Based countries and different proficiency levels. This
on Corpora." He retrieved double-object approach will help generalize the characteristics and
constructions from the interlanguage error patterns of acquiring double-object constructions by
information corpus at Nanjing Normal University and learners from different countries, thus providing
classified them into six categories: request, effective assistance for the teaching of double-object
accompany, dispatch, nurture, accompany, and constructions in Teaching Chinese as a Foreign
naming. The study found that the frequency of use of Language (TCFL).
double-object constructions by foreign students was
highest in the request category, followed by the 3. Research Methods
accompany category, dispatch category, possession (1) Literature Review Method
category, nurture category, and naming category. To provide a more solid theoretical foundation for the
However, this study overlooked the differences in the study of double-object construction errors among
acquisition of double-object constructions by learners Japanese learners, I conducted a literature review. This
from different countries and did not provide a involved purchasing books online, borrowing books
comprehensive classification of double-object from the library at Beijing Language and Culture
construction syntactic structures, thus having certain University, and searching for relevant papers and
limitations. journals on CNKI (China National Knowledge
Guo Yanni's (2019) "Study on the Acquisition of Infrastructure) related to double-object constructions.
Double-Object Constructions by International By summarizing the research achievements of
Students Based on BCC Corpus" used Beijing previous scholars in the field of double-object
Caietele Confucius 68